OpenMP® Forum

If the purpose of cOMPunity has been superceded by the contributor membership, and there is admittedly no activity in the cOMPunity organization, perhaps it's time to formally close it down. It's still listed as a member, which according to MarkB's reply, is misleading at best. If a business shuts d...

Today I see the compunity.org website is at least resolving to something, but it's some old information. It says "The cOMPunity website provide up-to-date information" but the newest information on the site is from 2006. I still wonder if cOMPunity is really alive. Is Dr. Chapman still the president...

The compunity.org address has expired [at least as of July 24 2019]. Is cOMPunity still active? I see it is still listed as an OpenMP member. Does it have any presence, and does it add any value? There is a compunity twitter account, and it's had precisely one post, in 2008. For some reason, zoominf...

Page 64, lines 12 and 21, refer to the OpenMP Context Definitions document which is available on http://www.openmp.org. Is this document available?

The comment for the glossary item for program order says "For C11 and C++11, program order corresponds to the sequenced before relation..." In this sentence, "program order" is italicized. "sequenced before" should be similarly italicized or quoted.

In the Glossary for device, "A device could have one or more processors." What is a device with zero processors? Can an OpenMP thread execute on anything other than a processor?

You misspelled the name of one of your keynote speakers both on the program web page and on the program PDF. The keynote talk title for John Mellor-Crummey's talk (who is not Crummy) is also missing from the program PDF. A couple other misspelled words: Application-level Enery Awareness, I don't kno...

What if the 'target' region is executing on the initial device? Is that behavior well-defined? Is there a concept of an inactive target region, as there is with an inactive parallel region? omp_in_parallel is well defined to distinguish between in an active parallel region vs. only in inactive paral...

Clearly you are not a Fortran programmer. In Fortran, the !$omp declare target would appear within the subprogram to which it applies. Fortran, unlike C/C++, doesn't have the concept of a file or file scope, so there is no way to say 'declare target' from here in the file to some 'end declare target...

page 98 line 7, C/C++ "If an array section is a list item in a map clause, and the array section is derived from a variable for which the type is pointer, reference to array or reference to pointer then the data-sharing attribute for that variable in the construct is private." I think would be bette...