Search found 73 matches
- Wed Oct 09, 2019 3:55 pm
- Forum: Using OpenMP
- Topic: compunity: dead or alive
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2110
Re: compunity: dead or alive
If the purpose of cOMPunity has been superceded by the contributor membership, and there is admittedly no activity in the cOMPunity organization, perhaps it's time to formally close it down. It's still listed as a member, which according to MarkB's reply, is misleading at best. If a business shuts d...
- Sat Aug 31, 2019 5:46 pm
- Forum: Using OpenMP
- Topic: compunity: dead or alive
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2110
Re: compunity: dead or alive
Today I see the compunity.org website is at least resolving to something, but it's some old information. It says "The cOMPunity website provide up-to-date information" but the newest information on the site is from 2006. I still wonder if cOMPunity is really alive. Is Dr. Chapman still the president...
- Wed Jul 24, 2019 10:49 am
- Forum: Using OpenMP
- Topic: compunity: dead or alive
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2110
compunity: dead or alive
The compunity.org address has expired [at least as of July 24 2019]. Is cOMPunity still active? I see it is still listed as an OpenMP member. Does it have any presence, and does it add any value? There is a compunity twitter account, and it's had precisely one post, in 2008. For some reason, zoominf...
- Wed Sep 26, 2018 8:55 am
- Forum: TR7 - OpenMP 5.0 Draft Discussion
- Topic: OpenMP Context Definitions
- Replies: 0
- Views: 8307
OpenMP Context Definitions
Page 64, lines 12 and 21, refer to the OpenMP Context Definitions document which is available on http://www.openmp.org. Is this document available?
- Wed Aug 01, 2018 9:38 am
- Forum: TR7 - OpenMP 5.0 Draft Discussion
- Topic: Program order
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2551
Program order
The comment for the glossary item for program order says "For C11 and C++11, program order corresponds to the sequenced before relation..." In this sentence, "program order" is italicized. "sequenced before" should be similarly italicized or quoted.
- Wed Aug 01, 2018 9:35 am
- Forum: TR7 - OpenMP 5.0 Draft Discussion
- Topic: Can a device have zero processors
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2489
Can a device have zero processors
In the Glossary for device, "A device could have one or more processors." What is a device with zero processors? Can an OpenMP thread execute on anything other than a processor?
- Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:48 pm
- Forum: Conferences and Events
- Topic: Please proof read your IWOMP program
- Replies: 0
- Views: 6558
Please proof read your IWOMP program
You misspelled the name of one of your keynote speakers both on the program web page and on the program PDF. The keynote talk title for John Mellor-Crummey's talk (who is not Crummy) is also missing from the program PDF. A couple other misspelled words: Application-level Enery Awareness, I don't kno...
- Mon Aug 31, 2015 2:38 pm
- Forum: OpenMP 4.1 DRAFT - Public Comments
- Topic: omp_in_target?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5341
Re: omp_in_target?
What if the 'target' region is executing on the initial device? Is that behavior well-defined? Is there a concept of an inactive target region, as there is with an inactive parallel region? omp_in_parallel is well defined to distinguish between in an active parallel region vs. only in inactive paral...
- Mon Aug 31, 2015 2:35 pm
- Forum: OpenMP 4.1 DRAFT - Public Comments
- Topic: elemental functions
- Replies: 4
- Views: 23944
Re: elemental functions
Clearly you are not a Fortran programmer. In Fortran, the !$omp declare target would appear within the subprogram to which it applies. Fortran, unlike C/C++, doesn't have the concept of a file or file scope, so there is no way to say 'declare target' from here in the file to some 'end declare target...
- Fri Aug 14, 2015 6:03 pm
- Forum: OpenMP 4.1 DRAFT - Public Comments
- Topic: target construct: If an array section...
- Replies: 0
- Views: 5356
target construct: If an array section...
page 98 line 7, C/C++ "If an array section is a list item in a map clause, and the array section is derived from a variable for which the type is pointer, reference to array or reference to pointer then the data-sharing attribute for that variable in the construct is private." I think would be bette...