Page 1 of 1

Enhancement proposals for the 3.0 draft

PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:52 am
by s03145
Hi,

I read a few parts of the draft, here are some things that do not seem right to me (but maybe I am wrong) :

- On page 169 line 24 after examle A.10.1f it says "The example prints: 2 3." However I do not see that anything is printed in the example (at least if bar is an unknown function).

- Shouldn't the output of the example A.10.2.f on page 170 line 20 to 25 have only two colums, because "print *, klast, jlast" only prints two variables?

- There is a typo on page 323 line 17 "The omp_get_active_level runtime library routine has benn added": benn -> been


best regards,
Samuel

Re: Enhancement proposals for the 3.0 draft

PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:58 am
by s03145
Hi,

ups, I misread. The explanation is before the example not after it. So please ignore my comments.

best regards,
Samuel

Re: Enhancement proposals for the 3.0 draft

PostPosted: Wed Oct 24, 2007 9:54 am
by lfm
Thank you for pointing out the typo, I will add it to the list for 3.0 fixes, and see if there is some way to make it more clear (perhaps with better formatting) that the examples follow the descriptions.

-- Larry